Psychology Today blogs

Personality Blogs  

My Father Is More Intellectual than the Holy Father

My Dad Is Better than Your Dad was a reality TV show that lasted from February through April of 2008 on NBC. In it, fathers and sons competed in athletic contests, so the "better than your dad" applies to only a limited part of the fatherhood spectrum.

My dad would have stunk at the show. He was a scrawny guy, and he shied away from physical challenges.

He was bolder in the intellectual arena. Let me hasten to note that my father only had a high school diploma and sold shoes. But he read the daily newspaper and weekly news magazines (U.S. News & World Report was his favorite), and he was extremely well-informed on politics, current events, and sports.

Moreover, when large events entered the daily news flow - like the war in Vietnam - my father staked out well-grounded, intellectually independent positions. He felt his mind was his own domain and he had the right to think through any question and come to his own conclusion.

Naturally, my father's outlook colored my own intellectual perspective. I was taught to be a free - even a daring - thinker. I couldn't get in trouble if a teacher complained that I didn't agree with the company, or school, line. That complaint held no water in my home.

On Saturdays, my father took me to work at his shoe store. Sometimes he gave a ride to a man who lived near us and worked nearby my father's small store. One time, this man clucked about a friend's kid who had gone to college - and had come home with a facial tic.

Clearly, this man disapproved of higher education. But my father made clear to me, without arguing with the man, that his claim was nonsense. And, in fact, the data (as I learned to call it when I got my Ph.D.) do not support the idea that less well-educated people are mentally healthier - quite the opposite.

Which brings me to the Holy Father. Pope Benedict XVI, born Joseph Ratzinger, came to the papacy as a noted theologian - a professor and a thinker - who defends traditional Catholic values. He decries the intellectual secularization that is occurring (more notably in Europe than in the U.S.).

At a youth rally in New York, the Pope said:

What purpose has a freedom which, in disregarding truth, pursues what is false or wrong? How many young people have been offered a hand which in the name of freedom or experience has led them to addiction, to moral or intellectual confusion, to hurt, to a loss of self-respect, even to despair and so tragically and sadly to the taking of their own life?

Both that man in our car and the Pope feel that learning and thinking are dangerous! My father disagreed.

 

Comments

yeah

I'd follow your dad over this pope any day!!


In the paragraph you quoted,

In the paragraph you quoted, the Pope refers to Freedom "What purpose has a freedom ...." I don't see how the paragraph you quoted leads to the following conclusion you have made -

"Both that man in our car and the Pope feel that learning and thinking are dangerous!" Unless you are saying learning and thinking are the same as 'freedom' - obviously they are different concepts.


Typical

Both religion and government would naturally be against learning and thinking. It threatens the very core of their existence. On the religion side, learning and thinking could lead to someone changing their beliefs resulting in a drop in the number of their followers which leads to less money coming in, less control and ultimately, the discovery of whatever it is they are hiding, etc. I have my opinions of what those hidden things may be but nothing has ever and most likely will never be proven. Normally one would have no reason to fear or condemn learning if they weren’t trying to hide something or greatly deceive and lie. Which leads to the government side, they support and attempt to educate an individual enough so that he/she becomes a productive addition to society and have the ability to pass on qualities, laws, traditions, etc. to the following generation which in turn assures that society will continue to flow as they want it to flow and stay manageable and manipulative. Learning becomes a threat to the government when an individual learns from sources other than what they have carefully constructed and designed for whatever the situation could be because it leads to truth (lies and hidden or tucked away facts are discovered), demand for proper justice, realization of their corrupt and flawed system, rebellion or uprising, illusions being unmasked, etc.

Though that is all the positive likely results that could happen if the majority of people would do their own independent learning and stop trusting that everything they are brought up to know as truth is the actual truth. On the flip side, worst case scenario, the world advances their intellect to the point of destroying both systems. As much as I must disagree with several aspects of government and religion I must also admit that we need them to maintain civility and order, at least at this point in time. For example, if everyone woke up tomorrow and it was suddenly fact that there was no God and no hell in which the evil are punished, the law would go unacknowledged, morals and ethics would be forgotten, the government would crumble, chaos would dominate and the world as we know it would finally become the apocalypse most fear of coming. It would quickly make this a very primitive and savage planet for the human race once more. Mass population control would no longer be possible.


Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
zero plus equals one
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".

Blogger  

Find a Therapist
Choose the best match from
thousands of profiles.