Psychology Today blogs

Ask iGod

In my last post, I explained how magical thinking might help us navigate cyberspace. But there are several cases where we've already jumped the gun in attributing powers to our tech toys.

•Nick Yee, who studies the psychology of online role playing games, surveyed 380 people on superstitions in online worlds. A typical response: "on my first dragon raid, I was regaled with a long list of things I MUST NOT DO or else the raid would be wiped. Not one of them was valid, but they were incredibly detailed and equally silly. (Things like you can't switch weapons, press hotkeys, cast spells, attack anything but a single leg of the dragon, that sort of thing)."

•New media artist Rob Seward built a Consciousness Field Resonator based on the pseudoscientific premise that psychic energy affects random number generators (RNGs). His device hangs on a wall and flashes when there's a spike of nonrandomness in its RNG's output. "Any time it goes off in this manner, the user tries to associate it with a significant event either in his life or the lives of others," Seward writes. It could be hot sex or the death of a loved one. "Even if his rational mind thinks the basis of this device is complete nonsense, the primitive brain will develop superstitions around the machine."

•B.F. Skinner induced "superstition" in pigeons by feeding them at regular intervals and watching them associate the food with a repertoire of arbitrary behavior that grew in scope as the experiment progressed. Forty years later, Japanese researcher Koichi Ono placed a randomly incrementing electronic point counter and some randomly flashing lights next to three false levers and watched as one human subject going for a high score eventually abandoned the levers altogether and exhausted herself after 15 minutes of jumping to touch the ceiling with her slipper. Anyone familiar with the TV-rabbit-ears-dance will recognize this procedure intimately.

•For a while there were conspiracy theories about how random the iPod shuffle function is; users noticed weird patterns and Steven Levy had to ask Apple engineers to assure him it was really random. People still see connections between songs and whatever is happening at the moment, and some use the shuffle function as a sort of magic 8 ball: Ask it a question, hit "next," and interpret at will. I just asked iTunes if I will meet someone special this weekend, and "Poor Kakarookee" by Venetian Snares came up. Um, that song contains only two lyrics: "poor" and "Kakarookee." No help at all.

•Cliff Pickover has a great online ESP experiment. Try it. Then read the explanations people have submitted. You'll see all kinds of jazz like "Quantum mechanics may permit synchronicity of thought and computer software. I suggest that, on the quantum level, you were able to predict the card I selected even before I selected it." That's an attempt at a technological explanation, but magical spells and rituals are (misguided) forms of technology too: finding the hidden laws that connect mind and matter and exploiting them.

We all see patterns where they don't exist, and we're also programmed to detect intentional agents--we anthropomorphize inanimate objects that merely hint at being alive. So we may perpetually overestimate the capabilities of artificial intelligences we come across. And a new study reported in the February issue of Psychological Science (pdf) says that the lonelier you are, the more that will happen. In the study, people who felt more more socially isolated attributed higher levels of free will, consciousness, and emotions to gadgets like "'Clocky' (a wheeled alarm clock that 'runs away' so that you must get up to turn it off)". Uh oh. Psychologists reported a decade ago that loneliness increases with Internet use. That means: more geeking out, more loneliness, more reliance on technology for companionship, and the cycle repeats. It looks like we've got a dangerous feedback loop here, at least until Teddy Ruxpin learns hold up his end of the conversation. He can be so insensitive sometimes.

UPDATE: Looking for a message in "Poor Kakarookee" might have been futile, but that album (Songs About My Cats) harbors life on another track. According to spectography, there are seven cats trapped in the song "Look." Look:

Poor Kakarookee!

Comments

Seriously, you have to offer

Seriously, you have to offer stuff to God. Use your head -- what might God like? Praise, attention and entertainment come to mind. You gotta pay to play, so I know better than to play the lottery. I do generate random songs from the same timer sampling technique. Some are good, some not-so-good. It might be correlated with offerings. He mentioned honest scales once, implying you get a response in proportion to the quality of what you offer.

In the publicly released version of LoseThos, my operating system, I have a scaled-back random song generator with only one sampled timer value per song. The version I use samples the timer multiple times for note, duration and accent. Got lots of good songs. Adding words to songs, making hymns is a good offering to God.

God says...
INTERNAL CONDEMNEST INSTANT NUMBERS TRAVAILING OCEAN ABRAHAM
SUCCESSIVELY DIRECTETH CALLEDST ADMIRED GHASTLY LORD'S
TEMPT FAMILIARLY ERST BEGINNING INTENTLY TOUCH SIEGE MIRTHFUL
RESPECTED MILLION OTHERS BUSY CAVERNS INFLECTION RECOGNISING
LETTERS TRIED INDENTURES LECTURED RACKS FIT OVERPAST UNJUSTLY
BUCKLER COMPUTER HOTLY TORN SCOURGED NINETEENTH THEY FRENZIED
HEAR RESPECTS BEAMS BRIERS REVEALEDST DENIETH PERSEVERING
END LIAR

I'm not a liar, am I? What's He talking about ;-)


Telepathy

There's a lot I don't know. I laugh heartily at spies and security people given the existance of God, angels or clarvoyants.

With my technique, God must do all the math so when I press a button and the signal makes it's way through the hardware and software, the timer is read at just the right time. I don't tend to imagine dead people, since Mhz and humans don't mix! It's not telepathy--there is no external way to know the state of the computer's timer and no observer mind involved. "The Holy Spirit" is a logical conclusion. It's descriptive.

I can use the "random" numbers to pick a line number into a book, like the Bible...

random passage:
word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them
that heard it.

4:3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I
have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the
works were finished from the foundation of the world.

4:4 For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise,
And God did rest the seventh day from all his works.

4:5 And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest.

4:6 Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and
they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief:
4:7 Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after
so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice,
harden not your hearts.

4:8 For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have
spoken of another day.


The first situation is fine,

The first situation is fine, but the example is poor. "on my first raid"...there are many rules. If a raid is not executed perfectly, the raid WILL wipe. 'not valid' is a comment born out of inexperience.


"We all have are sins"

dude, STFU


Depressing

The comments on that ESP website are depressing. It took me about 2 seconds to figure out the trick as it is definitely the oldest one in the book. Are people really that dumb? I guess that's all his experiment proves.


ESP

I emailed Cliff about it several years ago and he replied, in part: "My guess is that most people see it's a trick after a few tries, but some don't. I don't have statistics that tell me the ratio of the two classes of people. (After all, only a small set in both classes e-mail me.)"


Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Blogger  

Matthew Hutson's Recent Posts  

Find a Therapist
Choose the best match from
thousands of profiles.