Psychology Today blogs

Child Development Blogs  

Ruminations on the IQ and Virtue

Ruminations on the IQ and Virtue

Psychologists have long assumed that measures of infant intelligence are of little value in predicting later mental ability. This makes sense because intelligence tests are heavily verbal while the language skills of infants and young children are not well developed. New research, however, suggests that measures of curiosity and of selective attention in infants and young children do indeed predict later mental test scores. I anticipate that these findings will lead many companies to create kits for assessing and raising young children's IQs. Such kits will simply add to the current overemphasis on the IQ, and upon tests of academic achievement. This overemphasis has already led to an epidemic of cheating at all levels of education and to undue pressure on teachers to give good grades.

These reflections brought about my ruminations on the IQ. Individuals vary in their levels of brightness, their ability to adapt to new situations. Brightness is determined in part by heredity and in part by the environment and is generally constant across the life span. Individuals also differ in particular areas of mental functioning. I, for example, have absolutely no sense of direction while my wife is just the opposite and always knows just where we are. Another important consideration is that intellectual ability is not highly correlated with creativity. Many of our most gifted writers, musicians, and painters would probably not be admitted to a Mensa meeting.

It seems to me that the contemporary overemphasis on the IQ, and academic success, misses a very important corollary of high mental ability. In the broadest sense intelligence is a form of freedom. It affords one the ability to evaluate and make choices. The brighter the individual, the greater the freedom of choice. But freedom is necessarily linked to virtue, the ability to make moral choices. An emphasis upon intellectual achievement and academic success without an equal emphasis on virtue is one-sided and can work against the common good. Those who crafted the multi leveraged credit schemes that led to the current mortgage crises were ingenious. But they were lacking in virtue.

This is not to say that we should not value intellectual ability and academic achievement. It is only to say that high intelligence carries with it a moral imperative. As parents we need to ensure that our children appreciate not only the choices, but moral responsibility, that goes with superior mental ability.

Comments

Developing intellectual

Developing intellectual growth and nurturing intelligence in ways that are likely to ultimately benefit society is of upmost importantance. But just as important is the developement and emphasis on character and values. The smarter the person, the greater the possible impact - good or bad.


response to Ben Harrison

Thank you, You have made my point much clearly and precisely than I did.


response to Ben Harrison

Thank you, You have made my point much clearly and precisely than I did.


Moral Reasoning and Intellect

I think this blog gives weight to Kohlberg's stages of moral development. I'll be honest, I don't remember them all off hand but there are three levels each requiring more ability to think abstractly and use logic combined with empathic reasoning. Sadly, being able to assert morals at Kohlbergs highest level of development doesn't mean a person might not slip back into a lower stage and do domething just to avoid punishment. Kohlberg maintains that humans fluctuate up and down the scale throughout thier lives, but just being able to get to the highest stage is a reflection of superior moral intellect.


Morals, Character, Genius?

The very nature of profound intellect (profound, and not just high) circumvents morals, character, personality, etc.

Let's agree that the smarter one is perceived to be, the more influence the individual may have.

Let's agree that in order to prevent more Pinky and the Brain type Mad Scientists, trying to Take Over the World, smarts should be multi-packaged, equipped with morals, ethics, and empathy.

Now lets talk human nature. Point of fact, higher intellect seems to correlate with less regard for the feelings, lives, and general being of others. Why is that? When teaching gifted children, instructors are often made aware of the discordancy between intelligence and sociability. Really smart (not just studied up, tutored up, tested up kids who are Mommy's Little Einsteins)children seem to have trouble making and keeping friends. Some research evaluates that their greater knowledge creates a rift in communication. Very early on, these children learn that they are "different" from others, in an age where everyone wants you to be "normal."

The profoundly gifted individual may often distance himself from less intelligent people. and the smarter you are, the fewer peers you are likely to find. Thus, interest in others diminishes.

Then morals and ethics, to the profound intellect, are represented in the scope of what they are: social mechanisms. And if I am smarter than you, therefore better than you, why need I play by your rules?

I'm not saying every really gifted person thinks in this way. What I am trying to point out, however, is that high intellectuality bends the rules of social convention.

Indeed, rather than being dilligent about improving our children's I.Q.'s, we should be more effective in improving all other aspects of their lives. Studies show that high I.Q. has very little to do with propensity for success.

So maybe we should can the commercialized "learning games" and all go play some dress-up, pirates, and mud-pie making. I'd rather have a happy kid than a stressed out brainiac anyday.


Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Blogger  

David Elkind, Ph.D.'s Recent Posts  

Find a Therapist
Choose the best match from
thousands of profiles.