Psychology Today blogs

Spirituality Blogs  

Understanding Karma: Action, Non-action, Responsibility, Accountability and Consequence

One of the most misunderstood notions in Eastern thought is that of karma. In the West, we often think about good karma and bad karma --- you do something good, good will come back to you; you do something bad, and bad will come back. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth. Karma is about action, non-action, responsibility, accountability and consequence.

Karma literally means ‘action'. Karma Yoga is the yoga of action. What that means, in the context of the Yoga tradition, is lending ourselves to society and being of service to other human beings. One of the most familiar of Karma Yogis in modern times is Ram Dass who, along with being a primary voice for spiritual awakening in the West, established the Seva Foundation, which provides spiritual support to the dying. Another familiar person who falls into this category would be Mother Teresa, whose Missionaries of Charity are familiar to almost all of us.

Karma within the context of the Yoga tradition speaks to the first of the yamas or restraints, which is a code of conduct for living virtuously. The first of these is ahimsa, or non-harming.

Outside of this context, karma is an action that has no charge. It is neither a good, nor bad -- it simply is. In fact, one element of the samurai tradition which finds its expression in modern Aikido is the ethic, ‘No action is an action'...everything has a consequence, and consequences are at the heart of karma.

What karma is truly about is accountability, responsibility, and consequences. How does this translate into our day-to-day lives, without being some kind of esoteric Zen-based philosophical conundrum? It translates into this -- there are no bad decisions.

What in the world do I mean, there are no bad decisions? Exactly that -- there are no bad decisions --- there are only consequences to our decisions. Let me give the example I use when I work with alcoholics and addicts, to help illustrate this notion. I find this concept of no bad decisions helpful for those trying to reshape their day-to-day thinking and it goes something like this:

When you get in your car and leave work, turning left to go to the liquor store instead of turning right to go home, you haven't made a bad decision...when you walk into the liquor store, you haven't made a bad decision...when you buy a bottle, you haven't made a bad decision...when you bring the bottle home, you haven't made a bad decision...when you open the bottle and pour yourself a glass of whatever, you haven't made a bad decision...when you raise the glass and drink, you still have not made a bad decision...

What you have done is potentially engender consequences for which you need to be responsible and ultimately accountable. That's karma, plain and simple. Here, we get back to the notion of action -- not good or bad or anything else. Working out our karma means taking responsibility for the choices that we make and being accountable to those choices because every choice has a consequence.

Remember, when a butterfly in Africa beats its wings, the air currents in North America change...it's all connected, and we are the thread that holds the warp and woof of the tapestry together.


© 2008 Michael J. Formica, All Rights Reserved

My Psychology Today Therapists Profile My Website
Email Me Directly Telephone Consultations

 

Comments

Retroactive value

I know little about Eastern Philosophy but I found this post to be very interesting. Are you saying that karma is mis-interpreted as something we can control? We tend to make statements like "putting out some good karma." Are you suggesting the only judgement of good and bad can be made via consequence? Can we then retroactively place a judgement on a past choice? ( Ex. Choosing to drink too much resulted in the negative consequence of getting sick) Can we then retroactively value the choice as "bad" even though it was neutral as it happened?


Brilliant question

Becky:

You're going to have to bear with me. I am well aware that this post is somewhat less cohesive than some of my others here. I have been struggling all day with a how to clarify some of what I've said as I've decided that, rather than posting a complete idea, to some degree I posted a thought process!

That said, I will not answer your question here, for two reasons: first, your question points out a fatal flaw, if not in my argument at least my presentation and, secondly, your question poses a fantastic jumping off point for the follow-up to this article that I have been kicking around all day.

Look for my next post, as it will address your questions directly, in the full forum, rather than "backstage", as it were.

I fear I may have opened up a theo-philosophical can of worms, but the readers seem to like it!

Blessings,
Michael


advice

About a year and a half ago, my wife revealed to me she had been having an affair. We have gone to counselling and are reconciling. We were both so ashamed and embarrassed that it happened that we agreed not to tell anyone, including the wife of the other man.

I realize that part of the affair is my fault. I neglected my wife and I am making amends.

But here's the part about karma. Right now it pains me to think of the other man getting off scot-free after inflicting so much pain. I absolve myself by thinking that karma will get him and there is no need for me to do anything. What do you think? My wife is dead-set against telling anyone anything. She wants it to die out without any more damage. But what about the other man? Doesn't he deserve to feel the consequences of his actions? What do you think?


Whom does it serve?

Anon:

One of my teachers who, in addition to being a Shaolin Kung Fu Master, is a Clinical Social Worker and a very wise man suggested to us that, before we act, we ask the question, "Whom does it serve?"

How would you answer that question in this situation? You are angry, true and hurt...but what have you lost? In reality, not much.

What have you gained? Insight, a stronger marriage, some valuable lessons about yourself, your wife and how to be more attentive to cultivating and maintaining your relationship.

And what would you gain by bringing this issue to this man? Only the satisfaction of visiting pain on someone because he made a selfish choice. And, in the end, I suspect you will find that not so satisfying.

As for him, assuming that he getting off scot-free is a big assumption because (here, _I_ assume) you don't know what he is thinking or feeling.

Leaving it alone may not feel satisfying or comforting or even very comfortable, but in time you will recognize it to be the better choice, I suspect. Put the energy you are spending on something you can't really influence or control into healing your marriage.

Blessings,
Michael


thank you

I showed your reply to my wife. Thank you for taking the time to write something so well thought out, it was very helpful. You are a good person. I will not tell his wife and I'll focus on moving on with our lives. Thanks again.


No, my thanks...

My thanks for your kind words. We are all only here to help each other out.

Best of luck.

Blessings,
Michael


Just another thought for

Just another thought for "anonymous" and his wife. There is nothing gained for you in trying to make someone else feel the same pain they have inflicted or try to make him see the consequences of his actions. You have a chance to live with love and heal together. Take it and run. Don't waste your time with negative energy.
His accountability and responsibility for poor choices are his own to face...or not. We all make poor choices. Learn and grow.
Best of luck. You are stronger than you know.


Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Blogger  

Michael J. Formica, MA, Ed.M, NCC, LPC's Recent Posts  

Find a Therapist
Choose the best match from
thousands of profiles.