Psychology Today blogs

Media Blogs  

Bipolar Disorder: Not the Politics, the Experience

landmark Newsweek coverMy beloved former producer from “The Infinite Mind, ” Mary Carmichael, has the cover story in the current Newsweek. “Welcome to Max’s World” represents a landmark, a major magazine devoting its cover — the banner reads “Growing Up Bipolar” — to a child who has not otherwise made news. There’s no sidebar on what the diagnosis means, whether too many kids get labeled and treated (and whether the pharmaceutical industry is to blame), or how parents can find help. Some of this information is in the essay; a good deal of it, in the modern fashion, is on line. (A overview of the biology of manic depression features top scientists speaking in sober fashion.) But mostly, the narrative carries the load. Mary spent five weeks with a family, the Blakes, and pored over their scrapbooks and their son’s medical records. What we see is a disturbed and disturbing — sometimes threatening or violent — child stumbling through daily life.

What does this mean, for a portrait of an unknown family to bear such a burden? I’m wanting, informally, to ask one of those “deconstruction” questions about a milestone for the mass media. Boiled down, I think that the story, and its prominent, isolated placement, says that mental illness is real, it’s devastating, it’s complex, and it’s larger than the political wars that simmer around it.

Should a pre-adolescent be medicated? I have a standard answer for this question: Hard cases make bad law. (Apparently this saying was already a commonplace when Oliver Wendell Holmes cited it in a decision in 1904.) What I mean is: We know that our medications and behavioral interventions should be better, but we also know that families can bear only so much, and that the harm mental illness does in a developing child is substantial. "Max has been on 38 different psychoactive drugs" — and we can see why. I am tempted to ask who would stand in judgment of the Blakes or their doctors, but perhaps a better way to phrase the question is: once we witness their struggle, don’t we all look on with admiration?

A note regarding diagnosis: Yes, the Newsweek text and headlines are pitched to an interest in bipolar disorder, but who knows what this kid has? Mary writes that Max’s secondary symptoms include hyperactivity, anxiety, obsessionality, attention deficits, dyslexia, and pronounced elements of oppositional-defiant disorder. A current movement in psychiatry favors “dimensional” diagnosis, cataloging scattered problems rather than grasping for syndromes. This trend can be taken too far, but especially in the case of children, whose disorders are often protean, the approach can signal an appropriate agnosticism. That’s the other theme of this distinctive magazine presentation, a stand-alone account of a single troubled child: science is progressing at an extraordinary pace, but in the face of these complex disturbances of mood, thought, and temperament, we all — parents, teachers, doctors, pundits — do well to remain humble.

Comments

easy stuff- show me the needle in the haystack!

It sometimes irritates me that people take away feelings of accomplishment when seeing such ostensible mental illness. The tricky ones are the smart depressives who destroy their life and their families life and then look for excuses because of their mental delusions,and then therapists with an untrained eye help them find the excuses. You of course, changed history with your understanding of nuances. Anyone looking for another Kramer masterpiece,they should read ''freud'' an outstanding book!


Max vs. Millions

Having read the Newsweek article regarding Max, I have to say I have an enormous amount of compassion for Max's parents. They have every right to do whatever they feel is neccessary to give thier son a good life. Still, they can't expect society to also do whatever is neccessary to give thier son a good life or to understand his illness. Max's daycare had every right to kick him out as did the public school system. Life is very unfair and some people just aren't able to exist within the required societal norms. Hopefully Max and his parents will find a way to appreciate life from a different experience. Having a "normal" life isn't always the key to happiness. Max likely feels enormous pressure to fit in when he knows this is a near impossible task. Parents want thier kids to enjoy what they enjoy or what most people enjoy, and feel obligated to give them these experiences. Max's dislike of the feel of grass beneath his feet was portrayed as if somehow tragic rather than a personal preference stemming from an oddly configured brain. Forcing a square peg in a round hole will only lead to more pain.


Max vs Millions

You said - "Max's daycare had every right to kick him out as did the public school system." Where do you get this idea? Legally and morally, I disagree. Legally, the public schools must provide Max with a free and appropriate public education, and provide special education services when needed - as they clearly are for Max. The law also provides pre-K services for children and families in need. There is no "right" to throw any child out of public ed - or society - thank goodness. Life may indeed sometimes be unfair, and as "citizens" of this world, I believe we all share a moral imperative to improve this where we can. Your attitude leads only to a fatalistic view and more harm.


Newsweek: Bipolar Disorder: Not the Politics, the Experience

Thanks goodness for voices like Dr. Peter Kramer who questions the validity of labeling and drugging children with the lastest and greatest "disorder".
At present that seems to be, "bipolar", but mixed with other comorbid "disorders'.

Too many children are truly gettng a bad rap these days and too many parents are being led down a path of misinformation about "illnesses" that may or may not even be there. The lack of well rounded information makes them vulnerable and thus difficult for them to discern between what is actually known and what is surmised. The deception is almost unbearable, except when others, like Dr. Kramer, Dr. and Dr. Peter Breggin et al, speak out.

What's tragic and very unconstitutional is these are not the "vocices" heard enough.


What about other kids rights?

I don't think I was being harsh by saying the school had a right to kick him out. Schools only have a right to provide a free and appropriate education to the degree that it can reasonably be provided. If a child like Max is being incredibley disruptive, the other children lose thier right to a free and appropriate education. I think sometimes people need to just accept that thier child is not cut out for the regular public school system and needs an alternative form of education (I never suggested this alternative education should not be provided). The really sad thing is that in my experience many of the E.I kids themselves don't want to be in a regular school but thier parents are forcing them to be "normal."


I would like to know exactly

I would like to know exactly what is bipolarity.
Is it maniac-depression? What does it mean to be Bipolar 1, bipolar2, bipolar3?
It became too confusing.


Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Blogger  

Find a Therapist
Choose the best match from
thousands of profiles.