Psychology Today blogs

Happiness Blogs  

From Pathological to Positive: A New Psychology for the Twenty First Century

These days when people come to my office, I'm not interested solely in rooting out their painful personal and familial issues. Building on their strengths, positives, achievements moral, ethical, and spiritual beliefs, is much more helpful, I've found, in overcoming psychological and interpersonal problems.

Vaclav Havel, playwright, dramatist, statesman, humanist and former President of the Czech Republic, beautifully and boldly encapsulates the lessons we should have learned from the ignominious twentieth century: Without a sober and conscionable approach to human events, affluence and technology has bred world wars, genocide, greed, and despair. This is especially tragic in an era that could have used innovation, expertise and prosperity to create a renaissance of the human spirit.

"Whenever I reflect on the problems of today's world, whether they concern the economy, society, culture, security, ecology or civilization in general, I always end up confronting the moral question: what action is responsible or acceptable? The moral order, our conscience and human rights - these are the most important issues at the beginning of the third millennium."

Twentieth century psychology paralleled the prevailing societal ethos with a focus on psychopathology, internal and intrapersonal psychological wars, and individual wants, needs, impulses, and feelings. Rather than developing as an inspirational art and providing guidance based on strength, optimism, hope, and wisdom, therapists were taught to be scientific practitioners of a skill taught to help people indict their parents and partners in the hopes of attaining symptom relief. While indictments are often merited, unless initiated after a moral inventory of personal responsibility and accountability, indictment simply justifies psychopathological behavior.

Many psychotherapy orientations still use the prevailing twentieth century focus on psychopathology. Psychological education often ignores questions of wrong and right, faith and fidelity. Hope and optimism are pejoratively labeled reassurance and deemed to thwart patients' autonomy. In psychological circles, wisdom is circumvented with a prohibition against giving advice.

The hopeful news is that the twenty first century has ushered in Positive Psychology, a treatment that focuses on positives, strengths, and moral character. Virtue, spirit and character are emerging as crucial elements of professional guidance. Blame and negativity are being replaced with a positive attitude and a quest for correct behavior in an imperfect world.

The challenge for all of us is to bring our behaviors in line with our convictions. Whenever I've asked a person whether they aspire to be a good human being who lives in a virtuous manner, their answer is "yes, of course I do, I'm a good person. I always want to do the right thing." When I point out to them that their actions contradict their beliefs, an individual will invariably stop dead in their tracks and pause to think. The benefit of this kind of thinking immediately suggests new ways to handle personal and painful issues and conflicts that hurt, upset, and anger others. It helps people assume responsibility for their own behavior and changing focus from MY needs to what their immediate community needs. It stops accusation and blame and gives direction to a higher purpose of positive and happy human relationships. The willingness of people to bring their behaviors in line with their beliefs, their desired perception of themselves, will always put a person where they really want to be, on the high road to more hopeful, optimistic and positive living.

 


Comments

From pathology to the positive

Hi ,

I am also advertising in this Magazine as a therapist from New Jersey,Highland Park. In fact I just completed my post yesterday. What struck me , in reading other therapists's posts was that morality and character, virtue and personal responsibility are never mentioned. these concepts do not seem to fit into the psychodymanic model.

I was very pleased to hit upon your blog. It is great that you dared to say what should have b een obvious for some time. It is a very good piece.

I need to think a little more deeply... for my own benefit... if the characterization of psychopathology as negative and the character/morality approach as positive is not too sharp.
I agree with your points wholeheartedly,but like to suggest that approaching matters from the ange of personal responsibility, living up to one's creed, values, conscience etc. is not just "positive" but it is right. It is more in harmony with commonsense and indeed , human nature.As a healing method it has so much more promise than cogitating on how other people screwed me up. Spending a few years on that is enough to make one depressed.
So , thanks for sharing your thoughts.


thank you

Thank you for your kind comment; I bet you're a good therapist and your patients are helped by your focus on personal responsibility as opposed to blame.


Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
six plus four equals
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".

Blogger  

Find a Therapist
Choose the best match from
thousands of profiles.