Psychology Today blogs

Child Development Blogs  

Karl Marx on the Playground

No, I am not a Marxist, although, like many of my generation, I fancied myself one when I was in college. But I am still occasionally an economic determinist, which means, to me, that sometimes the solution to apparently complex social problems can be found by following a relatively simple rule: follow the money. When children engage in mysterious and unsettling social behavior, very often the social setting is the culprit. And often the reason for the unsettling context is parsimonious behavior on the part of adults. "Following the money" in thinking about kids' problems is a wonderful exercise, and often a bracing alternative to the endless cant about our devotion to "our nation's children." We will do anything for "our nation's children" except spend real money on them.

In my last post, I discussed kids' playground aggression and the sometimes-silly rules designed to stop it. But now let's follow the money when we think about this problem. Unless we want kids to be totally unsupervised on the playground (something Europeans will accept, but totally unthinkable here) we need some kind of playground supervisors. Who's it gonna be? Teachers need prep time, and teachers' unions demand it. So supervising the playground goes to underpaid and therefore underskilled aides. They're not unionized, which is why they are underpaid, and in my experience they often have the least training of anyone in a public school when it comes to understanding kids.

So, we have kids who are more and more pressured by high-stakes testing (and if the kids don't perform, the school gets labeled as an underperforming school with attendant financial consequences; see "following the money," above). And when the kids are out on the playground they need to let off some steam, and sometimes they get a little rambunctious. And who is supervising them? Underpaid cranky people who don't really know what to do except holler, and make rules that cannot be enforced (like "no competition": see my last post).

There are people who supervise "free play" periods: they're called nursery school teachers. They now how to observe kids- they know when kids need to be left alone and when they need adult intervention. They know when a particular kid is having a hard day, and therefore they know when they have to lurk a little closer so that they can intervene quickly if and when intervention becomes necessary. Fifth graders on the playground are just bigger nursery school kids, and supervising them requires the same subtle combination of observational lurking, restraint, and quick decisive action used by good nursery school teachers. But good nursery school teachers are not usually on the playgrounds; thus the silly rules.

If we were really concerned about kids' squabbling on the playground, we would hire someone made from the following recipe: one part hip male college student; one part gym teacher; one part school adjustment counselor and one part nursery school teacher. Problem solved, I guarantee it. But that would require paying someone with this combination of skills. When you figure in all the time wasted by the school principal carrying out the mini-Inquisitions, it doesn't really seem like such a big expense, does it?

 

 

Comments

Playground aggression as artificact of age segregation

David,
I think you hit the nail on the head in suggesting that at least some of the playground aggression comes from the pressures of high-stakes testing, etc. I also think that, within the framework of what we are currently doing, your suggestion about supervision makes sense.

However, I would like to encourage people to look deeper and think about more fundamental changes in how we treat our children. I think much of the aggression we see is an artifact of (a) the general competitive nature of schooling and (b) age segregation.

Age segregation is a modern artifact of schooling. During all of history before modern times, especially during hunter-gatherer history, children played in age-mixed groups. I have been observing age-mixed play for years--not as a supervisor but as a researcher watching unobtrusively--and I have yet to see any serious aggression. The children I have been observing are students--age four on through teenagers-- at a democratically organized non-graded school. Sometimes teasing occurs, but when it does some older kid (who may be just 7 or 8--younger than your fifth graders) usually steps in, quite naturally, and tells the teaser to knock it off.

I have also observed, in a variety of contexts, that kids of all ages who are supervised are more aggressive than those who aren't. They are also more likely to behave in other irresponsible and sometimes dangerous ways when supervised than when not supervised. It is as if they give up their own personal responsibility when they think an adult is in charge--responsibility that they manifest when no adult is around.

I'm dealing with issues such as these in a new blog that has some connections with yours. It's at http://blogs.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn.

Thanks.


Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
minus six equals three
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".

Blogger  

David Anderegg, Ph.D.'s Recent Posts  

Find a Therapist
Choose the best match from
thousands of profiles.