I love how in one post you try to simultaneously perpetuate stereotypes and demolish feminism. Your post does not "prove" anything about all girls being "sexually coy and shy" and all boys being "sexually aggressive." As always, you take one "fact" and, without using other supporting evidence, make unprovable generalizations. So what if the Samoa story was a hoax? This is ONE story. This is ONE small factor in the development of feminism. That doesn't make feminism any less valid, and it certainly doesn't disprove cultural determinism or the role of socialization in determining gender roles and behavior in general. When are you going to get serious and start writing posts that are actually worth reading? It's as though your freedom from peer review has caused you to run rampant. All you seem to be concerned with is using your unsupported generalizations to perpetuate stereotypes and increase inequality between the sexes. Your blog rights should be taken away; you write poorly in every sense and your "logic" is nonexistent.
Proof that Satoshi Kanazawa is an idiot
I love how in one post you try to simultaneously perpetuate stereotypes and demolish feminism. Your post does not "prove" anything about all girls being "sexually coy and shy" and all boys being "sexually aggressive." As always, you take one "fact" and, without using other supporting evidence, make unprovable generalizations. So what if the Samoa story was a hoax? This is ONE story. This is ONE small factor in the development of feminism. That doesn't make feminism any less valid, and it certainly doesn't disprove cultural determinism or the role of socialization in determining gender roles and behavior in general. When are you going to get serious and start writing posts that are actually worth reading? It's as though your freedom from peer review has caused you to run rampant. All you seem to be concerned with is using your unsupported generalizations to perpetuate stereotypes and increase inequality between the sexes. Your blog rights should be taken away; you write poorly in every sense and your "logic" is nonexistent.